The increasing recognition of the importance of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) has permeated various sectors, and research is no exception. Within the realm of scientific inquiry, fostering environments where individuals from all backgrounds can thrive and contribute meaningfully is not merely an ethical imperative but also a catalyst for innovation and progress. This report specifically addresses the crucial context of STEM research conducted within hospital settings, a unique intersection of healthcare priorities and scientific advancement. The purpose of this analysis is to explore effective strategies for integrating EDI principles into such research endeavors, delving into the inherent challenges and proposing robust, potentially controversial, and impactful solutions. A thorough and honest examination of these multifaceted elements is essential to drive meaningful and sustainable change within this critical domain.
At the core of EDI lies a triad of interconnected concepts that must be understood and addressed holistically to foster truly inclusive research environments. Equity in research pertains to fairness in access and the opportunity to succeed. It necessitates a recognition of systemic barriers that have historically marginalized certain groups and a commitment to dismantling these barriers through concrete actions. This involves acknowledging that equal treatment may not always lead to equitable outcomes and that differential approaches may be required to ensure that historically excluded groups have full access to meaningful opportunities 1. Diversity encompasses the range of human differences and variations present within a research setting. This includes differences in demographics such as race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, disability, and age, as well as variations in levels of experience, social identities, worldviews, epistemologies (how knowledge is considered ‘true’), and axiologies (the value assigned to particular ‘truths’) 1. Recognizing and valuing this rich tapestry of human differences is fundamental to fostering a vibrant and innovative research ecosystem. Inclusion, the third pillar, is understood as the active process of cultivating full, effective, and significant engagement of individuals from all backgrounds, particularly those from equity-denied groups. In a research context, inclusion means ensuring that all researchers are meaningfully engaged with the team, are represented in all areas of the research process, and benefit equally from research results 1. These three elements are separate yet intrinsically linked, and when implemented together, they hold the potential to create research environments that account for the systemic barriers that continue to limit the full participation of historically excluded groups 1. Furthermore, the concept of intersectionality is vital, recognizing that individuals often possess multiple social identities that can overlap and interact, leading to unique experiences of marginalization and privilege 3. Understanding these intersecting identities is crucial for developing nuanced and effective EDI strategies. Increasingly, the notion of belonging is also recognized as a critical component, emphasizing the psychological safety and sense of acceptance necessary for all individuals to feel valued and thrive within a research environment 1. This goes beyond mere representation and focuses on creating a culture where everyone feels they truly belong and can contribute their best work.
Despite increasing awareness and the proliferation of equity, diversity, and inclusion initiatives, STEM fields, including those within hospital settings, continue to grapple with significant disparities in representation and opportunity. Historically and presently, individuals from certain groups, such as women, racialized individuals, Indigenous Peoples, persons with disabilities, and members of LGBTQ2+ communities, remain underrepresented in STEM disciplines, particularly in leadership positions within academia and industry 5. These disparities are not accidental but rather the result of deeply ingrained systemic barriers. These barriers can manifest as biases in funding allocation processes, where research proposals from individuals from underrepresented groups may be evaluated less favorably 6. Similarly, biases can exist in publication processes, affecting whose research is deemed worthy of dissemination, and in career advancement pathways, hindering the progression of individuals from marginalized backgrounds 5. While various EDI initiatives have been implemented by governmental bodies and institutions, their impact is often limited because they may not address the fundamental, root causes of inequity or consider the entire academic and professional trajectory of an individual 5. For instance, the pervasive “publish or perish” culture within academia, which heavily emphasizes publication records for funding and career progression, can disproportionately disadvantage individuals from underrepresented groups. These individuals often face additional demands on their time, such as increased expectations for mentorship of junior colleagues and service work on EDI committees, which can detract from the time available for research and grant writing, often accomplished at the expense of work-life balance 5. This phenomenon, sometimes referred to as the “equity tax,” further exacerbates existing inequalities 1. Moreover, the traditional STEM curriculum and research methodologies often operate from a Eurocentric perspective, disproportionately highlighting the contributions of Western male scientists. This can alienate students and researchers from diverse backgrounds and limit the scope and relevance of scientific inquiry by overlooking other valuable knowledge systems and perspectives, such as Indigenous ways of knowing 5.
Integrating EDI principles into hospital-based STEM research presents a unique set of challenges stemming from the complex interplay of hospital environments, healthcare priorities, and established scientific research cultures. In these settings, the primary focus on immediate patient care can inadvertently overshadow the importance of EDI initiatives in research if they are not explicitly linked to improved patient outcomes and equitable healthcare access. The urgency and demands of clinical practice may lead to a perception that EDI is a secondary concern, requiring a clear articulation of its direct relevance to enhancing the quality and impact of research for all patient populations 9. Furthermore, hospitals and academic medicine often exhibit hierarchical structures that can impede EDI efforts. Established power dynamics may make it difficult to challenge existing norms and practices that perpetuate inequalities, requiring a concerted effort from leadership to foster a culture of openness and inclusivity 10. The sensitive nature of health data adds another layer of complexity. Collecting and analyzing data on diverse patient populations necessitates careful consideration of ethical implications, particularly regarding privacy and confidentiality 11. Researchers must navigate regulations such as HIPAA in the United States, which mandates stringent security measures for electronic data interchange (EDI) in healthcare, to ensure the responsible and ethical handling of sensitive demographic and health information 12. Ensuring diverse representation in clinical trials is a particularly salient challenge in hospital-based research. Historical mistrust of the medical system within certain communities, accessibility barriers such as transportation and childcare, and culturally insensitive recruitment practices can all contribute to underrepresentation, potentially limiting the generalizability and applicability of research findings to diverse patient populations 9. Finally, the technical and financial barriers associated with implementing EDI, particularly concerning electronic data interchange (EDI) systems for managing research data, can be significant for hospital-based research organizations. Integrating new systems with existing infrastructure, ensuring data security and compliance, and providing adequate training for research staff all require substantial investment and expertise 13.
To effectively navigate these challenges and foster meaningful EDI integration in hospital-based STEM research, a multi-faceted approach is essential, addressing various aspects of the research ecosystem. Building inclusive research teams begins with implementing equitable hiring and promotion practices. This includes setting clear, measurable targets for diversity, ensuring accountability for achieving these targets, and regularly auditing team composition regarding the representation of equity-denied individuals, their seniority, and compensation 1. Inclusive language should be used in all job and student postings, actively encouraging applications from historically excluded groups and explicitly stating available accommodations. Publicizing opportunities through a variety of channels, including those targeted towards underrepresented communities, is also crucial 1. To mitigate bias in selection processes, diverse representation on hiring and review committees is paramount, and the expertise of committee members with extensive EDI knowledge should be valued and compensated. Developing interview questions and assessment criteria through an equity lens, considering future potential and the barriers faced by equity-denied groups, is also vital. Furthermore, engaging in cluster hiring initiatives can help to foster a sense of community and avoid the isolation often experienced by individuals from underrepresented groups when they are the sole representative on a team 1. Fostering an inclusive research environment and culture requires a proactive and sustained effort. Establishing EDI committees and resource centers within research organizations can provide a focal point for these efforts, facilitating the development and sharing of learning materials and best practices 1. Implementing clear policies and procedures to address discrimination, bullying, and harassment, with explicit support for victims and preventative measures, is fundamental to creating a safe and respectful environment 1. Promoting cultural humility among research staff and providing ongoing, high-quality training on topics such as unconscious bias, anti-racism, cultural safety, and care for sexual and gender diverse groups are essential for fostering a more inclusive and understanding research culture 2. Ensuring the highest level of accessibility in all physical and digital spaces and research activities, including providing a list of available accommodations and a clear process for requesting additional ones, demonstrates a commitment to inclusivity 1. Finally, recognizing and valuing diverse contributions beyond traditional metrics like publications, such as community outreach, mentorship, and service work, can help to create a more equitable and holistic assessment of researchers’ impact 5. Integrating EDI into research design and methodology is crucial for ensuring that research is relevant and beneficial to diverse populations. This involves actively involving researchers from underrepresented groups and individuals with lived experiences in all stages of the research process, from conceptualization to dissemination 1. Established theories and methodologies should be critically examined from an EDI perspective, questioning underlying assumptions and biases 1. Incorporating intersectional analysis and disaggregating data by relevant diversity factors, such as sex, gender, race, ethnicity, and disability, can reveal important differences between groups and lead to more nuanced and accurate findings 2. Researchers should carefully consider the potential impacts of their research on diverse populations and strive to ensure equitable benefits, avoiding unintended negative consequences 2. Utilizing inclusive language and culturally sensitive approaches in all research materials, participant interactions, and dissemination strategies is paramount for building trust and ensuring effective communication 15. For hospital settings, improving EDI in clinical trials requires targeted strategies to enhance participation from underrepresented populations. This can include utilizing patient navigators from diverse communities and establishing community advisory boards to provide guidance on cultural safety and inform recruitment strategies 15. Establishing trial sites in diverse geographic locations, including rural and community settings, and implementing decentralized trial procedures such as e-consent and remote data collection can improve accessibility 15. Reviewing and revising inclusion and exclusion criteria to assess and mitigate potential biases against underrepresented populations is essential to ensure that trial populations reflect the diversity of patients seen in clinical practice 15. Translating trial materials into multiple languages and ensuring culturally appropriate communication methods are used can also significantly improve participation 15. Providing financial and logistical support to participants, such as reimbursement for transportation, lodging, and childcare costs, can help to alleviate barriers to participation 15. Finally, standardizing the collection of EDI data elements, such as race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender identity, with appropriate safeguards for privacy and confidentiality, is crucial for monitoring representation and conducting meaningful analyses 15.
Despite the clear benefits of integrating EDI, these initiatives can face resistance and spark controversy. Concerns may arise about lowering standards or the potential for reverse discrimination when implementing EDI-focused practices 21. Addressing these concerns requires transparent communication about the goals of EDI, emphasizing that the aim is not to lower standards but to broaden the pool of talent and perspectives that contribute to research excellence 7. The implementation of diversity quotas or targets can also be contentious, raising questions about how to balance these with merit-based evaluations. While targets can be useful for driving progress and ensuring accountability, it is crucial to emphasize that they should be part of a broader strategy that also focuses on creating equitable evaluation processes and addressing systemic biases 1. The collection and use of demographic data can also be a source of controversy. Concerns about privacy, the potential for misuse, and the risk of tokenism or stereotyping must be addressed through clear guidelines, transparent data governance practices, and a focus on using data to identify and address systemic inequities rather than making assumptions about individuals 2. Furthermore, if EDI initiatives are perceived as merely performative or fail to produce tangible results, they can lead to “EDI fatigue” or cynicism among researchers and staff 21. To avoid this, it is essential to ensure that EDI efforts are meaningful, well-resourced, and have clear goals and evaluation metrics. Finally, the very definition of “excellence” in research can be a point of contention. Traditional definitions often prioritize metrics like publications and grant funding, potentially undervaluing other important contributions such as community engagement, mentorship, and EDI advocacy. A critical re-examination of what constitutes excellence is necessary to ensure that diverse forms of contribution are recognized and valued 5.
Effective EDI integration hinges on the commitment and active involvement of leadership at all levels of the hospital-based STEM research organization. Leadership plays a crucial role in setting the vision for EDI, allocating the necessary financial and human resources, and ensuring accountability for the implementation and progress of EDI initiatives 2. Leaders must model inclusive behaviors in their own interactions, actively seek out and value diverse perspectives, and promptly and decisively address any instances of bias or discrimination 24. Embedding EDI into organizational policies, practices, and decision-making processes is also paramount. This includes reviewing and revising existing policies related to hiring, promotion, mentorship, and research evaluation to identify and eliminate any systemic barriers 2. Continuous learning and improvement in the area of EDI are essential for leaders. They should stay updated on the latest research and best practices, participate in training sessions, and engage with experts in the field to deepen their understanding of EDI issues 24. Addressing the challenge of “EDI management with inadequate tools” is also critical. Leaders need access to robust, real-time data and actionable insights to guide their actions and effectively measure the impact of EDI initiatives 2.
Integrating EDI into hospital-based STEM research is not only a matter of fairness and social justice but also an ethical imperative. It aligns with fundamental principles of justice, ensuring that all individuals have equitable opportunities to contribute to and benefit from research, and respects the inherent dignity and human rights of all participants and researchers 1. Ethical considerations must be embedded throughout the entire research lifecycle. In research design, this involves being mindful of how identity factors might influence the research questions being asked, the methodologies employed, and the potential impacts on different groups 2. Data collection must be conducted in a culturally sensitive and accessible manner, ensuring that informed consent is obtained from diverse participants in a way they understand and that respects their autonomy 11. Ethical considerations also extend to data analysis and interpretation, where researchers must be vigilant in avoiding the perpetuation of biases or the drawing of conclusions that could harm or marginalize certain groups 2. Furthermore, the ethical implications of data ownership, control, and possession are particularly important when research involves Indigenous communities, requiring adherence to established guidelines and principles such as OCAP (Ownership, Control, Access and Possession) 2. The increasing reliance on electronic data in healthcare research introduces novel ethical challenges related to safeguarding patient privacy and confidentiality, ensuring equitable access to technology, and responsibly using big data while respecting individual rights 11. Finally, ensuring equitable and meaningful Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in research raises ethical considerations related to power dynamics, biases in recruitment, and the need for clear guidance to ensure that diverse voices are genuinely valued and can influence the research process 28.
Learning from the experiences of other institutions can provide valuable insights into effective EDI implementation. For example, the NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) has developed a comprehensive EDI strategy that includes increasing diversity and representation, integrating EDI into systems and processes, and actively engaging the research community in these efforts. Their Race and Ethnicity Advisory Group (READ) provides researchers with advice on studies and supports engagement with diverse ethnic backgrounds 29. Boston Children’s Hospital established an EDI Research Review Committee to review research protocols through an equity lens, focusing on community engagement, addressing barriers to participation, and using inclusive language 16. These examples highlight the importance of leadership support, dedicated resources, and the integration of EDI considerations into various aspects of research practice. Conversely, unsuccessful EDI implementations often share common characteristics. A lack of sustained commitment from leadership, insufficient allocation of resources, inadequate training and support for staff, and a failure to address underlying systemic barriers at a fundamental level can all contribute to the failure of EDI initiatives 30. For instance, a pilot implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) system at St. Paul’s Hospital failed due to a lack of training and follow-up, insufficient management commitment, and poor network infrastructure 30. These cases underscore the need for a thoughtful, well-resourced, and sustained approach to EDI integration.
Measuring the impact of EDI initiatives and ensuring their long-term sustainability are critical for demonstrating their value and driving continuous improvement. Establishing clear metrics and evaluation frameworks is essential for assessing the effects of EDI efforts on research outcomes, team culture, and patient equity 3. This can involve collecting and analyzing both quantitative data, such as representation statistics and funding success rates for different groups, and qualitative data, such as feedback from researchers and participants on their experiences 33. Transparency in reporting EDI data and progress is crucial for building trust and accountability within the research community 33. To ensure the long-term sustainability of EDI efforts, they must be embedded into the strategic plans and governance structures of the hospital-based STEM research organization, rather than being treated as isolated projects 32. Establishing continuous feedback mechanisms, such as regular surveys and focus groups, and adopting adaptive approaches to EDI implementation will allow organizations to respond to evolving needs and ensure the ongoing relevance and effectiveness of their initiatives 19.
In conclusion, fostering a truly equitable and inclusive hospital STEM research ecosystem requires a fundamental and ongoing transformation in organizational culture, values, and practices. While the challenges are significant, ranging from addressing deeply ingrained systemic barriers to navigating the complexities of the healthcare environment, the potential benefits for scientific advancement, patient care, and societal impact are immense. This necessitates a comprehensive, honest, and potentially challenging approach that moves beyond superficial gestures towards meaningful and sustained change. Strong and committed leadership is paramount, setting the vision, allocating resources, and ensuring accountability for EDI initiatives. Actively engaging researchers, staff, and patients from diverse backgrounds in all aspects of the research process is crucial for ensuring relevance and building trust. By learning from both successes and failures, establishing clear metrics for impact, and embedding EDI into the core fabric of the organization, hospital-based STEM research institutions can cultivate environments where everyone can thrive and contribute to a more equitable and healthier future for all.
Table 1: Definitions of Key EDI Terms in Research
| Term | Definition | Source(s) |
| Equity | Fairness in access and opportunity to succeed, recognizing and dismantling systemic marginalization. May require differential treatment to achieve equal outcomes. | 1 |
| Diversity | The range of human differences including demographics, experience, social identities, worldviews, knowledge systems, and values. | 1 |
| Inclusion | Actively cultivating full, effective, and significant engagement of individuals from all backgrounds, especially equity-denied groups. Ensuring all researchers are valued, respected, supported, and can fully participate. | 1 |
| Intersectionality | The overlapping and interacting nature of social identities and related systems of oppression, leading to unique experiences of marginalization and privilege. | 3 |
| Belonging | The psychological safety and sense of acceptance necessary for individuals to feel valued and thrive within a research environment. | 1 |
Table 2: Challenges and Solutions for EDI Implementation in Hospital-Based STEM Research
| Category | Specific Challenge | Proposed Solution(s) | Relevant Snippet IDs |
| Research Teams | Underrepresentation of certain groups | Implement equitable hiring and promotion practices with targets; use inclusive language in postings; actively seek diverse candidates; ensure diverse hiring committees; consider cluster hiring. | 1 |
| Research Environment & Culture | Systemic biases, discrimination, harassment | Establish EDI committees and resource centers; implement clear anti-discrimination policies; promote cultural humility and provide EDI training; ensure accessibility; value diverse contributions. | 1 |
| Research Design & Methodology | Eurocentric perspectives, lack of inclusivity | Involve researchers from underrepresented groups and individuals with lived experience; question established theories; incorporate intersectional analysis; consider impacts on diverse populations; use inclusive language. | 1 |
| Clinical Trials | Underrepresentation of certain populations | Use patient navigators and community advisory boards; establish diverse trial sites; implement decentralized procedures; revise inclusion/exclusion criteria; translate materials; provide financial/logistical support; standardize EDI data collection. | 15 |
| Data Management | Sensitive health data, regulatory compliance | Adhere to data privacy regulations (e.g., HIPAA); implement robust security measures; ensure ethical data collection and use. | 11 |
Table 3: Key Elements of Successful EDI Implementation: Lessons from Case Studies
| Case Study | Key Success Factors | Challenges Faced | Outcomes | Relevant Snippet IDs |
| NIHR Maudsley BRC | Strong leadership commitment; establishment of EDI champion role; creation of advisory groups (e.g., READ); integration of EDI into board meetings; online promotion of EDI initiatives. | Not explicitly mentioned | Increased diversity in research workforce and PPIE contributors; broader scope and access to research; greater internal and external collaboration. | 29 |
| Boston Children’s Hospital EDI Research Review Committee | Institutional prioritization; protected time for committee members; inclusion of diverse perspectives on the committee; focus on community engagement and inclusive language. | Initial frustration from some researchers about added review layer. | Improved incorporation of health equity principles in research protocols; guidance on addressing structural determinants of health; better engagement with communities. | 16 |
| University of Toronto (SickKids Affiliation) | Leadership commitment; data-driven policy development; setting EDI targets for CRC chairholders; collaboration with affiliated institutions. | Meeting national targets for diversity in CRC chairholders. | Efforts to exceed national targets for diversity in research leadership. | 35 |
Works cited
1. www.ualberta.ca, accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.ualberta.ca/en/research/media-library/ediinresearch-report-2024-update.pdf
2. Best Practices in Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in Research – sshrc crsh, accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/funding-financement/nfrf-fnfr/edi-eng.aspx
3. Equity/Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, and Other EDI Phrases and EDI Policy Frameworks: A Scoping Review – MDPI, accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2813-4346/2/1/11
4. DISCUSSING DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION (EDI) IN STEM – Women in STEM – Ingenium, accessed March 17, 2025, http://womeninstem.ingeniumcanada.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Ingenium-Women-in-STEM-Poster-Education-Resource_OVERVIEW.pdf
5. EDI at Every Level: Inequities and Under-Representation in STEM – CSPC, accessed March 17, 2025, https://sciencepolicy.ca/posts/edi-at-every-level-inequities-and-under-representation-in-stem/
6. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed March 17, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39815359/#:~:text=EDI%20principles%20ensure%20that%20researchers,publication%2C%20and%20representation%20still%20persist.
7. Equality and diversity in research: building an inclusive future – PMC, accessed March 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11734222/
8. EDI Barriers in STEM: Resources List – University of Guelph, accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.uoguelph.ca/research/system/files/EDI%20%26%20Research%20-%20Barriers%20for%20STEM%20-%20Resources%20May%202023.pdf
9. Promoting Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) in Clinical Trial Accruals – Health eMatters, accessed March 17, 2025, https://healthematters.ca/wp-content/uploads/HeM-IMPACT-report-2024.pdf
10. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed March 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10882049/#:~:text=For%20college%20management%2C%20EDI%20leadership,organizational%20effectiveness%20%5B13%2C14%5D
11. Editorial: Ethical considerations in electronic data in healthcare – Frontiers, accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1454323/full
12. EDI Standards: ANSI X12, EDIFACT & HIPAA Explained – TrueCommerce, accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.truecommerce.com/blog/edi-standards-explained/
13. Understanding HIPAA EDI Transactions in Healthcare – Integrate.io, accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.integrate.io/blog/hipaa-edi-transactions-in-healthcare/
14. EDI in Healthcare: How to Maximize Your Efficiency – Glorium Technologies, accessed March 17, 2025, https://gloriumtech.com/edi-in-healthcare-how-to-maximize-your-efficiency/
15. Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) Framework for Clinical Trials – – 3CTN, accessed March 17, 2025, https://3ctn.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/EDI-Framework.pdf
16. Bringing equity to health equity research – Boston Children’s Answers, accessed March 17, 2025, https://answers.childrenshospital.org/health-equity-research-review/
17. Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) in Clinical Trials – – 3CTN, accessed March 17, 2025, https://3ctn.ca/equity-diversity-and-inclusion-in-clinical-trials/
18. Supporting Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) in your Research Group and Research Activities – Toronto Metropolitan University, accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.torontomu.ca/content/dam/science/Faculty-of-Science-Dimensions-Program_Some-Resources-to-Support=EDI-in-your-SRC.pdf
19. How can equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) principles be incorporated into research excellence with industry and community partners? Lessons learned from Canada and Australia on projects with a dementia focus – PMC, accessed March 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11484242/
20. NSERC guide on integrating equity, diversity and inclusion considerations in research, accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/NSERC-CRSNG/Policies-Politiques/EDI_guidance-Conseils_EDI_eng.asp
21. Sustaining EDI efforts in a challenging new normal – American Psychological Association, accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.apa.org/monitor/2025/01/trends-equity-diversity-inclusion
22. Equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) – STIP Compass – OECD, accessed March 17, 2025, https://stip.oecd.org/stip/interactive-dashboards/themes/TH54
23. Building inclusive research cultures– How can we rise above EDI cynicism? – HEPI, accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.hepi.ac.uk/2025/03/05/building-inclusive-research-cultures-how-can-we-rise-above-edi-cynicism/
24. What Role Should Leadership Teams Play In DEI? – Diversio, accessed March 17, 2025, https://diversio.com/what-role-should-leadership-teams-play-in-dei/
25. Transforming higher education institutions through EDI leadership: A bibliometric exploration – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed March 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10882049/
26. (PDF) Assessing the Role of Leadership in Shaping EDI Policies and Initiatives in Hospitality Industries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Review – ResearchGate, accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378497515_Assessing_the_Role_of_Leadership_in_Shaping_EDI_Policies_and_Initiatives_in_Hospitality_Industries_A_Systematic_Review_and_Meta-analysis_Review
27. Equality and diversity in research: building an inclusive future – PubMed, accessed March 17, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39815359/
28. ‘A commitment to Equality, Diversity and Inclusion’: a conceptual framework for equality of opportunity in Patient and Public Involvement in research – Sapfo Lignou, Mark Sheehan, Ilina Singh, 2024 – Sage Journals, accessed March 17, 2025, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/17470161231224060
29. Our Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Strategy, 2023 – 2027 – NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.maudsleybrc.nihr.ac.uk/about-us/equality-diversity/our-equality-diversity-and-inclusion-strategy-2023-2027/
30. Implementation challenges and perception of care providers on Electronic Medical Records at St. Paul’s and Ayder Hospitals, Ethiopia – PubMed Central, accessed March 17, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8561912/
31. Equality, diversity and inclusion in research and innovation: UK review, accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/UKRI-020920-EDI-EvidenceReviewUK.pdf
32. Evolving EDI: Facing Challenges, Fostering Change – Accelerate, accessed March 17, 2025, https://accelerate.uofuhealth.utah.edu/impact/evolving-edi-facing-challenges-fostering-change
33. EDI In Research – University of Ottawa, accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.uottawa.ca/faculty-medicine/sites/g/files/bhrskd401/files/2022-09/edi_in_research_faculty_of_law-2.pdf
34. EDI strategy – NIHR Sheffield CRF, accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.sheffield.crf.nihr.ac.uk/equality-diversity-inclusion/edi-strategy
35. EQUITY, DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION ACTION PLAN – SickKids, accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.sickkids.ca/contentassets/040f4235bb7144fc8dbfc7a962a8ac38/research-institute-edi-action-plan-december2019.pdf
Leave a Reply